You say “I feel it is asking a lot of temporary off peak members of under, say, 30, to pay the full membership joining fee when their turn to become full members comes up.”
Our full membership subscription is £1,499 a year. The nearest similar club is Roehampton and offers far fewer facilities. The subscription is almost double.
Am I not right in thinking that off peak have already paid a proportion of their entry fee? If so what they are going to have to pay is the balance.
Do you really think it is too much to be asked to pay to get full membership of a club half the cost of Roehampton?